Jul 23, 2022 at 10:49am
There is one other aspect to my stance on video that's specific to the context of online debates. I try hard to be fair when debating, and part of that is being consistent in standards -- ie not expecting people to do or meet effort I'm not willing to do myself. Watching videos critically inherently takes a lot of work; you have to really pay attention and filter out a lot of extraneous data -- music, irrelevant images, etc -- to isolate the actual argument and points being made, and after you do so anyone else looking to the video as a source has to do the same thing. It's not work I'm willing to do, and so can't be work I expect others to do, especially as these arguments are always available in an accessible, non-video form.For instance, if Nan were to say "I watched Ukraine on Fire, and it really made an impression on me -- here are the points I took away from it" that'd be totally fine -- she watched the video and has extracted what she thinks is relevant and sharing that. Everyone else can engage on whether those points make a good argument or a poor one. Instead, though, if you ask her what the video says, she only says "watch the video" -- she's unable to pick out the actual argument and present it. But if I were to only demand that from Nan, while I myself started sharing videos I found convincing, then I can pretty easily end up having a double standard.So it's just easier all around to say "I don't watch videos." I don't cut myself off from any well-made arguments, and avoid the danger of sliding into favoritism or double standards.
There is one other aspect to my stance on video that's specific to the context of online debates. I try hard to be fair when debating, and part of that is being consistent in standards -- ie not expecting people to do or meet effort I'm not willing to do myself. Watching videos critically inherently takes a lot of work; you have to really pay attention and filter out a lot of extraneous data -- music, irrelevant images, etc -- to isolate the actual argument and points being made, and after you do so anyone else looking to the video as a source has to do the same thing. It's not work I'm willing to do, and so can't be work I expect others to do, especially as these arguments are always available in an accessible, non-video form.For instance, if Nan were to say "I watched Ukraine on Fire, and it really made an impression on me -- here are the points I took away from it" that'd be totally fine -- she watched the video and has extracted what she thinks is relevant and sharing that. Everyone else can engage on whether those points make a good argument or a poor one. Instead, though, if you ask her what the video says, she only says "watch the video" -- she's unable to pick out the actual argument and present it. But if I were to only demand that from Nan, while I myself started sharing videos I found convincing, then I can pretty easily end up having a double standard.So it's just easier all around to say "I don't watch videos." I don't cut myself off from any well-made arguments, and avoid the danger of sliding into favoritism or double standards.