Apr 30, 2024 at 4:17pm
Apr 30, 2024 at 2:15pm
FULL TIME/LONG TERM/NANNY/BABYSITTER/HOUSEKEEPER/MOTHER’S HELPER
Apr 30, 2024 at 11:47am
Our amazing driving nanny is available for work.
Apr 28, 2024 at 8:05am
(No Fees) Hire A Baby Nurse Here for Your New Borns! (732)-737-7165
Apr 27, 2024 at 1:46am
(NO FEES) Hire A Fresh Energetic Nanny/ Housekeeper Here ! (732)-737-7165
Apr 27, 2024 at 1:46am
(NO Fees) Hire Housekeepers Here! ( 732)-737-7165
Apr 27, 2024 at 1:46am
KF503 FT Live In or Live Out Nanny for 1 Infant (May Start)
Apr 29, 2024 at 9:15pm
PF505 FT Companion for 16 Year Old Boy (ASAP Start)
Apr 29, 2024 at 12:05pm
Part Time help for special needs young adult
Apr 27, 2024 at 4:43pm
Promote your business here - Businesses get highlighted throughout the site and you can add a deal.
Worse - are we really talking sending librarians to jail??
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2020/jan/16/missouri-could-jail-librarians-for-lending-age-inappropriate-books-parental-oversight-of-public-libraries-bill
Sorry, I couldn’t work out if this is purely a political issue or a wider issue affecting society at large.
If the current situation is that young readers generally aren’t permitted access to unsuitable (graphic, explicit, violent etc) content, why are people creating a new ruckus? (Well, yeah, public funding) If the current situation allows certain more progressive families to shepherd their growing children through the Ratings minefield as they browse and borrow, why is that a problem?
And why should the librarians bear the brunt of punishment for a family’s decision?? Especially when the profession’s code of practice insists on encouraging ethical open Stanards?