Equal pay for Women's Soccer?
Jul 14, 2019 at 1:40pm Edited
DaveSchmidt said:
drummerboy said:The question I think PVW is asking is: Why aren’t the jobs, or at least more of them, the same?
There is no study that shows that women get paid less then men for the same job.
Why do so many women want to work less hours per week than men do?
DaveSchmidt said:
drummerboy said:What’s keeping women from doing the same jobs as men?
Why aren't what jobs the same? How do you make more jobs the same?
What?
Like what jobs are you thinking of? What jobs do you think women are being kept from doing?
drummerboy said:
There is no study that shows that women get paid less then men for the same job.conandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
There is no study that shows that women get paid less then men for the same job.conandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moreconandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read Moreconandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read Moreconandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
There is no study that shows that women get paid less then men for the same job.conandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moreconandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read Moreconandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read Moreconandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
There is no study that shows that women get paid less then men for the same job.conandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moreconandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read Moreconandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read Moreconandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
There is no study that shows that women get paid less then men for the same job.conandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moreconandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read Moreconandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read Moreconandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
? There is a huge body of research that shows that women are often paid less for the same job. That’s the crux of wage disparity. Two main issues- 1) in same jobs, with same quail I dictations at similar companies, women get paid less. 2) that women are forced into lower paying jobs fir a variety of reasons thus making the wage gap issue that women make less than men just in general.
One example here: https://www.payscale.com/data/gender-pay-gap
conandrob240 said:
drummerboy said:
conandrob240 said:
PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moreconandrob240 said:
drummerboy said:
conandrob240 said:
PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
There is no study that shows that women get paid less then men for the same job.conandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moreconandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read Moreconandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read Moreconandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
conandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moreconandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read Moreconandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read Moreconandrob240 said:
PVW said:
drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read MorePVW said:
drummerboy said:
PVW said:
drummerboy said:
PVW said:
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs
Help Wanted
Employment Wanted
Latest Jobs
Jul 17, 2019 at 9:27pm
Jul 17, 2019 at 9:04pm
Paola 24 yr. Columbian Au Pair Looking for Host Family - Immediate Placement
Jul 17, 2019 at 8:24pm
FullTime Driving Nurturing Loving Nanny Available
Jul 17, 2019 at 4:57pm
Jul 17, 2019 at 3:20pm
Seeking elderly care position.
Jul 17, 2019 at 3:19pm
local rising college freshman babysitter / ORGANIZER
Jul 17, 2019 at 2:25pm
Experienced & Reliable Nanny Available
Jul 17, 2019 at 2:14pm
Jul 17, 2019 at 12:45pm
infant /toddler professional nanny
Jul 17, 2019 at 11:01am
For Sale
Garage Sales
Short Hills Estate/Moving Sale
Sale Date: Jul 19, 2019
More infoFree Items
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read Moreconandrob240 said:
drummerboy said:
conandrob240 said:
PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
There is no study that shows that women get paid less then men for the same job.conandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moreconandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read Moreconandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read Moreconandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
conandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moreconandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read Moreconandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read Moreconandrob240 said:
PVW said:
drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read MorePVW said:
drummerboy said:
PVW said:
drummerboy said:
PVW said:
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs
Help Wanted
Employment Wanted
Latest Jobs
Jul 17, 2019 at 9:27pm
Jul 17, 2019 at 9:04pm
Paola 24 yr. Columbian Au Pair Looking for Host Family - Immediate Placement
Jul 17, 2019 at 8:24pm
FullTime Driving Nurturing Loving Nanny Available
Jul 17, 2019 at 4:57pm
Jul 17, 2019 at 3:20pm
Seeking elderly care position.
Jul 17, 2019 at 3:19pm
local rising college freshman babysitter / ORGANIZER
Jul 17, 2019 at 2:25pm
Experienced & Reliable Nanny Available
Jul 17, 2019 at 2:14pm
Jul 17, 2019 at 12:45pm
infant /toddler professional nanny
Jul 17, 2019 at 11:01am
For Sale
Garage Sales
Short Hills Estate/Moving Sale
Sale Date: Jul 19, 2019
More infoFree Items
drummerboy said:
conandrob240 said:
PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
There is no study that shows that women get paid less then men for the same job.conandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moreconandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read Moreconandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read Moreconandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
conandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moreconandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read Moreconandrob240 said:
That’s BS. Of course women are paid less than men- many studies show the disparity. And it’s a real issue to fight for. This soccer thing is not an example of the disparity. There are real reasons the men’s team makes more than the women’s team. It’s a bad example and doesn’t reflect the real reasons there is wage disparity.PVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read MorePVW said:
Got it -- so rather than saying "women are paid less than men, that's a problem, and here are some challenges that will make this hard to fix," you opted to go for "women are paid less than men, and here's why they deserve it."drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read Moredrummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.
I guess that is a pretty simple point.Click to Read Moreconandrob240 said:
PVW said:
drummerboy said:
PVW said:I don't think you actually responded to my point.
drummerboy said:So that's why it's ok that they're paid less, because we've structured our athletics in a way where a women can never qualify for equal pay?
PVW said:Do you think for a minute that if there were a woman capable of playing in the NBA or men's soccer, that they wouldn't be there already? Do you really think that women don't play at that level simply because they're "not allowed"?
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs."
I don't know if the correct answer is "sports should not be gender segregated." I do know "women should be satisfied with structural inequity" is the wrong answer.
Women athletes get paid less because they produce less revenue. And they don't play in the NBA or men's soccer because they're not "good" enough to play there. (boy, gonna get in trouble for that one)
It's pretty simple.Click to Read MorePVW said:
drummerboy said:
PVW said:
drummerboy said:
PVW said:
This would make sense, if women were allowed to play in the NBA or in men's soccer. Otherwise, the argument is basically "women don't do the same job as men so they shouldn't be paid the same, but also they're not allowed to do the higher paying jobs
Help Wanted
Employment Wanted
Latest Jobs
Jul 17, 2019 at 9:27pm
Jul 17, 2019 at 9:04pm
Paola 24 yr. Columbian Au Pair Looking for Host Family - Immediate Placement
Jul 17, 2019 at 8:24pm
FullTime Driving Nurturing Loving Nanny Available
Jul 17, 2019 at 4:57pm
Jul 17, 2019 at 3:20pm
Seeking elderly care position.
Jul 17, 2019 at 3:19pm
local rising college freshman babysitter / ORGANIZER
Jul 17, 2019 at 2:25pm
Experienced & Reliable Nanny Available
Jul 17, 2019 at 2:14pm
Jul 17, 2019 at 12:45pm
infant /toddler professional nanny
Jul 17, 2019 at 11:01am
For Sale
Garage Sales
Short Hills Estate/Moving Sale
Sale Date: Jul 19, 2019
More infoFree Items
In order to add a comment – you must Join this community – Click here to do so.
For Sale
Sponsored Business
Promote your business here - Businesses get highlighted throughout the site and you can add a deal.
Advertisement
What’s keeping women from doing the same jobs as men?