Or, maybe not.
Is this another example of the NYT's dumb-*** both-siderism?
Maybe!
https://first-draft.com/2020/01/12/they-did-this-on-purpose/
May 16, 2024 at 10:23am
May 15, 2024 at 2:26pm
May 15, 2024 at 2:26pm
If you want your house sparkling for weeks ...please call me...9739917600
May 15, 2024 at 8:52am
***Laundry/Folding / Put away *** Ironing*** Closets and drawers organizing***
May 15, 2024 at 8:18am
SOF609 Thurs & Fri Summer Nanny for 1 (early June - late August)
May 16, 2024 at 7:41pm
SF5003 FT Nanny for 1 (June Start)
May 15, 2024 at 9:22pm
FLF603 FT Nanny for 3 Under 2 (July Start)
May 15, 2024 at 4:30pm
PT Househelp/Housekeeping/ Meal prep
May 15, 2024 at 3:27pm
Driving nanny/household manager for 3 year old twin boys Chatham ( 35 hours weekly)
May 15, 2024 at 11:50am
2007 Honda Fit $4,400
More info
House Contents Sale - Rain or Shine Sale Date: May 18, 2024
More info
Of course, as long as they're not reporting about the Clinton's, the Times can produce some very valuable material.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/01/12/us/texas-vs-california-history-textbooks.html