SOMA on fed's "Sanctuary" list. Star-Ledger 5/31/25

Not exactly.  Maplewood and South Orange both comply with the law as defined in the Constitution of the United States.  

according to whom.  someone might wanna give the town star chamber a primer on the Supremacy Clause.

BarneyGumble said:

according to whom. someone might wanna give the town star chamber a primer on the Supremacy Clause.

If can be according to you, if you’d like to identify which laws of the United States made in pursance of the Constitution are being violated.

DaveSchmidt said:

BarneyGumble said:

according to whom. someone might wanna give the town star chamber a primer on the Supremacy Clause.

If can be according to you, if you’d like to identify which laws of the United States made in pursance of the Constitution are being violated.

There is a thread in Politics about the same topic.
Here is a screenshot from Maplewood's resolution.

joan_crystal said:

Not exactly.  Maplewood and South Orange both comply with the law as defined in the Constitution of the United States.  

BarneyGumble said:

according to whom.  someone might wanna give the town star chamber a primer on the Supremacy Clause.

See highlighted phrase "comply with the law". The lie that they're defying the law ("give the town star chamber a primer on the Supremacy Clause") can be disregarded.

we’ll let the Supreme Court decide what does and doesn’t violate the Supremacy Clause as it relates to this matter, not some half assed recital in a poorly written star chamber resolution.

BarneyGumble said:

we’ll let the Supreme Court decide what does and doesn’t violate the Supremacy Clause as it relates to this matter, not some half assed recital in a poorly written star chamber resolution.

Please let us know which laws or regulations Maplewood and South Orange have violated which would then result in a violation of the Supremacy Clause.

yahooyahoo said:

BarneyGumble said:

we’ll let the Supreme Court decide what does and doesn’t violate the Supremacy Clause as it relates to this matter, not some half assed recital in a poorly written star chamber resolution.

Please let us know which laws or regulations Maplewood and South Orange have violated which would then result in a violation of the Supremacy Clause.

He doesn't seem to get that it's not a "supremacy clause" issue.

When the actions of a state or town are in compliance with applicable Federal law, then the "supremacy clause" is irrelevant.

https://floridaphoenix.com/2025/06/02/repub/homeland-securitys-list-of-sanctuary-cities-pulled-down-after-sheriffs-object/ 

BarneyGumble said:

we’ll let the Supreme Court decide what does and doesn’t violate the Supremacy Clause as it relates to this matter, not some half assed recital in a poorly written star chamber resolution.

The Supreme Court* on sanctuary cities in 2020:

Supreme Court won't hear Trump administration challenge to California's immigrant 'sanctuary' law (USA Today)

*Roberts, Thomas, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh

ril said:

https://floridaphoenix.com/2025/06/02/repub/homeland-securitys-list-of-sanctuary-cities-pulled-down-after-sheriffs-object/ 

TACO !