Roy Moore

I'd rather that my comments not be in mtierney's thread. So I've started this one and will try to transfer them to here.

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/11/nebraska-rnc-official-resigns-roy-moore-support-289308?lo=ap_b1


mtierney said: 

  Back in the day, it was more the custom for young women to marry older men with parental approval.  Theory was the groom was established in his career and could support a wife and children. To hold remembered accounts of behavior dating back 40 years as the worth of a person is  scary. Who will, wanting to aspire to elective office, survive such scrutiny?

My response:

40 years ago was 1977.

If by "back in the day" you mean 1877, well, maybe.

I was in my 30s in 1977. If I had been caught with a 14 year old I might still be in prison today.

  

Consider this.

http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2017/12/10/roy-moore-interview-sot-voice-of-alabama-politics.the-voice-of-alabama-politics/video/playlists/roy-moore/

 



LOST said:

mtierney said: 

My response:

40 years ago was 1977.

If by "back in the day" you mean 1877, well, maybe.

I was in my 30s in 1977. If I had been caught with a 14 year old I might still be in prison today.

I was 19 in 1977. I can testify that middle-school girls were not marrying 30-year-old men back then.

I strongly recommend not reading mtierney's thread. I'm 800+ posts behind and couldn't be happier. It was really messing with my head.


In his book, Roy Moore said he had seen Kayla "many" years earlier, although it doesn't specify how old she was when she first caught his eye. Women who spoke to the Washington Post said Moore asked them for dates in the late 1970s. Moore left Alabama in 1983, traveled to Texas and Australia, and returned in 1984, around the same time he met Kayla Kisor at the church Christmas party.

"Many years before, I had attended a dance recital at Gadsden State Junior College," Roy Moore wrote. "I remembered one of the special dances performed by a young woman whose first and last names began with the letter 'K.' It was something I had never forgotten. Could that young woman have been Kayla Kisor? Anxious to meet her, I began with the line, 'Haven't we met somewhere before?'"

Roy Moore wrote that he had a sense that his relationship with Kayla would be significant.

"I knew Kayla was going to be a special person in my life," Roy Moore wrote. "Long afterward, I would learn that Kayla had, in fact, performed a special dance routine at Gadsden State years before."

Kayla Moore was divorced and had a young daughter when Roy Moore married her in 1985. She was an adult when they dated and married, but she did attend school with the woman who accused Roy Moore of sexual assault in a Monday appearance orchestrated by attorney Gloria Allred. Beverly Young Nelson said she was a sophomore at Southside High School in 1977, alongside Kayla Kisor.

In the Washington Post story from last week, four women said Moore asked them for dates when they were between the ages of 14 and 18. He was in his early 30s at the time and working as a prosecutor in the Etowah County District Attorney's Office. The paper reported that he initiated sexual contact with a 14-year-old, and the most recent alleged victim said he groped her and grabbed her neck soon after she turned 16.

http://www.al.com/news/index.ssf/2017/11/when_did_roy_moore_meet_his_wi.html


It will be fascinating to see what happens if Moore does win.  I think most of the GOP hopes he loses.  It's yet another fracture of the Republican Party.



kthnry said:



LOST said:

mtierney said: 

My response:

40 years ago was 1977.

If by "back in the day" you mean 1877, well, maybe.

I was in my 30s in 1977. If I had been caught with a 14 year old I might still be in prison today.

I was 19 in 1977. I can testify that middle-school girls were not marrying 30-year-old men back then.

I strongly recommend not reading mtierney's thread. I'm 800+ posts behind and couldn't be happier. It was really messing with my head.

I was 31-32. If I had dated you (19) most people would have thought it weird.



jamie said:

It will be fascinating to see what happens if Moore does win.  I think most of the GOP hopes he loses.  It's yet another fracture of the Republican Party.

I assume they will roll over and let him smell their collective butt just like they've done with Trump.  



kthnry said:

I strongly recommend not reading mtierney's thread. I'm 800+ posts behind and couldn't be happier. It was really messing with my head.

I think mtierney's thread is a fine rebuttal to the argument that Trump supporters can somehow be redeemed.

If we are to move forward, it will be without these folk.



Klinker said:



kthnry said:

I strongly recommend not reading mtierney's thread. I'm 800+ posts behind and couldn't be happier. It was really messing with my head.

I think mtierney's thread is a fine rebuttal to the argument that Trump supporters can somehow be redeemed.

If we are to move forward, it will be without these folk.

Sad to say but some fraction of Trump supporters may be needed next time around.  A lot of assumptions here but all are within the realm of possibility. I don't have exact figures handy but Trump took maybe 47 the vote last time.  Now assuming he survives and chooses to run again and assuming there may be an attractive Third Party candidate..............The Dems will have to retain close to 100% of their last time vote

and siphon off some GOP voters. 

More assumptions...........if the Economy is healthy and the Market is at least some what favorable than it will look bad for the home team.........that is the liberals and those farther left.

I don't know what to think if Pence is the President then.  Trump entered the race as a lark and tapped a vein rich with voters but Pence projects a different image.  Evil with dignity and he can speak to his audience without putting on a side show. 



author said:



Klinker said:



kthnry said:

I strongly recommend not reading mtierney's thread. I'm 800+ posts behind and couldn't be happier. It was really messing with my head.

I think mtierney's thread is a fine rebuttal to the argument that Trump supporters can somehow be redeemed.

If we are to move forward, it will be without these folk.

Sad to say but some fraction of Trump supporters may be needed next time around.  A lot of assumptions here but all are within the realm of possibility. I don't have exact figures handy but Trump took maybe 47 the vote last time.  Now assuming he survives and chooses to run again and assuming there may be an attractive Third Party candidate..............The Dems will have to retain close to 100% of their last time vote

and siphon off some GOP voters. 


More assumptions...........if the Economy is healthy and the Market is at least some what favorable than it will look bad for the home team.........that is the liberals and those farther left.

I don't know what to think if Pence is the President then.  Trump entered the race as a lark and tapped a vein rich with voters but Pence projects a different image.  Evil with dignity and he can speak to his audience without putting on a side show. 

You lose too much in trying to appeal to deplorables.  The minority of decent people who voted for Trump have abandoned him.  Now we need to suppress the vote  of those who are so depraved that they continue to support rapists and child molesters. 

We are in a war for the future of our nation.  The Republicans have been fighting dirty for years and it consistently allows them to win elections they should have lost.  The time has come for the Left to take the gloves off and do what it takes to win and that means driving the the white supremacists and the misogynists back into the dark corners where they belong.



LOST said:

I was 31-32. If I had dated you (19) most people would have thought it weird.

Reminds me of the movie Dazed and Confused, where Matthew McConaughey is the older guy who hits on high school girls. It was plenty creepy back then. I remember those types.

"That's what I love about these high school girls, man. I get older, they stay the same age."



yes, even if some percentage of Trump voters are needed next time (though increasing turnout is the better strategy), that doesn't mean that the ones we need are the deplorables,  nor does it mean we need to craft a message that appeals to them.


author said:



Klinker said:



kthnry said:

I strongly recommend not reading mtierney's thread. I'm 800+ posts behind and couldn't be happier. It was really messing with my head.

I think mtierney's thread is a fine rebuttal to the argument that Trump supporters can somehow be redeemed.

If we are to move forward, it will be without these folk.

Sad to say but some fraction of Trump supporters may be needed next time around.  A lot of assumptions here but all are within the realm of possibility. I don't have exact figures handy but Trump took maybe 47 the vote last time.  Now assuming he survives and chooses to run again and assuming there may be an attractive Third Party candidate..............The Dems will have to retain close to 100% of their last time vote

and siphon off some GOP voters. 


More assumptions...........if the Economy is healthy and the Market is at least some what favorable than it will look bad for the home team.........that is the liberals and those farther left.

I don't know what to think if Pence is the President then.  Trump entered the race as a lark and tapped a vein rich with voters but Pence projects a different image.  Evil with dignity and he can speak to his audience without putting on a side show. 



Many of our grand and great grandparents were married very young but their mates were age appropriate. And of course, many families married off their young girls to old men due to land, money, etc issues. It's not a female's child's responsibility to dig her family out of their financial woes. If a man is 40 and his bride is 14, well, that's child abuse.

Funny thing about us Americans is that we laugh at other nations who do the above and think that either we a) don't do this to our girls b) have never done this to our girls and c) we can explain away why an old man married a child "back in the day." 


http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/200000-children-married-us-15-years-child-marriage-child-brides-new-jersey-chris-christie-a7830266.html

"More than 200,000 children were married in the US over the past 15 years, new figures have revealed.

Three 10-year-old girls and an 11-year-old boy were among the youngest to wed, under legal loopholes which allow minors to marry in certain circumstances.

The minimum age for marriage across most of the US is 18, but every state has exemptions – such as parental consent or pregnancy – which allow younger children to tie the knot."




At least Roy Moore and his wife aren't antisemitic  ohh 


Not only did she say "One of our attorneys is a Jew..." but she paused for effect and the crowd clapped and cheered.  

We are doomed.

Jasmo said:

At least Roy Moore and his wife aren't antisemitic  ohh 




The crowd cheered because they associate her sentiments. She's one of them. As is Trump. Do you think that if Jared wasn't a Kushner Trump would hold his tongue about Jared being Jewish? 


https://www.washingtonpost.com/special-election-results/alabama/?tid=sm_tw&utm_term=.8f6b503fa0cd

Exit poll shows

Moore: 47.00

Jones: 46.05

Write-ins: 3.45

Exit polls have been way off, but this looks very close.


I don't trust any poll except the actual vote count. (And I'm a little worried about that, as well, but it's what will determine the result.)


it’s not looking good. Such a sad commentary on what we’re living right now


Looking great.   Moore is tapped out.   Less than 5,000 vote difference with most of the remaining counties voting overwhelmingly Dems


Wow, close. Dare I hope?


Predictit has Jones at about 90%.

sbenois said:

Looking great.   Moore is tapped out.   Less than 5,000 vote difference with most of the remaining counties voting overwhelmingly Dems



Nyt predicting 78% for Jones.


NY Times site now has a difference of 133 total votes with 85% in.


MooreRep.527,23149.2
JonesDem.527,09849.2
Write-Ins16,7601.6

85% reporting

10:14 PM ET

VOTE SHARE

Dem.506070
Rep.506070

No results

MobileMontgomeryBirminghamTuscaloosaMobile


Is that true? I thought I just saw the exact opposite about precincts left reporting. Oh, please, please be true!

sbenois said:

Looking great.   Moore is tapped out.   Less than 5,000 vote difference with most of the remaining counties voting overwhelmingly Dems



In order to add a comment – you must Join this community – Click here to do so.